Talk:Radakan

w00t! Love it when developers contribute to the article themselves.--Kiba 02:17, 3 February 2008 (CET)
 * Aka it's biased. :( -- Jo  hn  J  09:45, 3 February 2008 (CET)
 * Biased how so? I just read the whole article and it seems to be just an explanation of features. It doesn't even use words like next-generation or best or anything when describing something that would generally indicate bias... would you point out where it is biased? --RB0 17:52, 3 February 2008 (CET)


 * Yeah, it's not that bad, but things like "the plan atm is to..." are rather useless, because they are not good to maintain and are too specific and fast-changing, so if a gameteammember creates an article it's always good to strip it down. Also there are no references unfortunately =) --Qubodup 20:25, 3 February 2008 (CET)

As unique as it gets? -- Jo hn  J  08:43, 4 February 2008 (CET)
 * Ahh, good catch ;) Though I'm not sure if that is technically biased, it is true, that is as unique as you can get in that regard ;) But true, it is unnecessary :) --RB0 20:59, 4 February 2008 (CET)
 * Still a 'lil bit of work needed. :P -- Jo  hn  J  17:25, 8 April 2008 (CEST)